Raja Aziz Addruse: Let's have certainty in this law
Quick exchange, in response: “So apostasy in Islam is a crime there too? Just like in all exclusively Islamic states? Can you imagine if apostasy was declared a crime among Catholics in the Philippines? About 80% would be criminalized on the basis of not going to Sunday mass regularly alone.”
Answer: “Malaysia claims to be a moderate Islamic country. You can convert to Islam but not out of it. Apostasy gets you sent to jail. It's easier to renounce Islam in Egypt or even Iran.”
**
Meanwhile, a piece of related news you might all want to comment on:
Tumbok Tabloid (4/28/08 Issue)
Isang dating ministro ng Iglesia ni Cristo na umanib sa Ang Dating Daan ang nasawi matapos tambangan sa Pampanga kahapon ng umaga.
Anim na tama ng bala ng kalibre 38 baril ang tumapos sa buhay ni Marcos Balais Mataro, 40, host ng Programang X-man ng ADD, ng ADD Compound, Barangay Sampaloc, Apalit Pampanga.
Sa inisyal na ulat ng pulisya, nag-aabang ng bus patungong Maynila sa toll gate ng San Simon si Mataro nang biglang hintuan ng Yamaha motorcycle (DY 4524) lulan ang dalawang lalaki.
Biglang pinaputukan ang biktima ng anim na ulit sa katawan bago tumakas ang mga suspek.
Si Mataro ay dating INC minister na nagtapos ng Evangelical Ministry sa New Era University at umanib sa ADD.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Religionwatch
Posted by R.O. at 2:43 PM 11 comments Links to this post
Saturday, April 26, 2008
The latest forwarded email
(Slightly edited)
WHY the PHILIPPINES IS SO POOR
It might hurt to admit but I think the article below holds a lot of TRUTH !!! Please read on....
Dear Friends,
Here is a good article sent by Dr. Arsenio Martin of Fort Arthur, Texas.. Enjoy reading.
THE DIFFERENCE
The difference between the poor countries and the rich ones is not the age of the country:
This can be shown by countries like India and Egypt, which are more than 2,000 years old, but are poor.
On the other hand, Canada , Australia and New Zealand, which 150 years ago were inexpressive (???), today are developed countries, and are rich.
The difference between poor and rich countries does not reside in the available natural resources.
Japan has a limited territory, 80% mountainous, inadequate for agriculture and cattle raising, but it is the second world economy. The country is like an immense floating factory, importing raw materials from the whole world and exporting manufactured products.
Another example is Switzerland, which does not plant cocoa but has the best chocolate in the world. In the little territory, they raise animals and plant the soil during four months per year. Not ony that -- they also produce dairy products of the best quality! It is a small country that transmits an image of security, order and labor, which made it the world's strongest, safest place.
Executives from rich countries who communicate with their counterparts in poor countries show that there is no significant intellectual difference.
Race or skin color are also not important: immigrants labeled lazy in their countries of origin are the productive power in rich European countries.
What is the difference then? The difference is the attitude of the people, framed along the years by the education and the culture and flawed tradition.
On analyzing the behavior of the people in rich and developed countries, we find that the great majority follow the following principles in their lives:
1. Ethics, as a basic principle
2. Integrity
3. Responsibility
4. Respect to the laws and rules
5. Respect to the rights of other citizens
6. Work-loving
7. Strive for savings and investment
8. Will of super action
9. Punctuality
10. and of course...Discipline
In poor countries, only a minority follow these basic principles in their daily life.
The Philippines is not poor because we lack natural resources or because nature was cruel to us. In fact, we are supposedly rich in natural resources.
We are poor because we lack the correct attitude. We lack the will to comply with and teach these functional principles of rich and developed societies.
If you do not forward this message nothing will happen to you. Your pet will not die, you will not be fired, you will not have bad luck for seven years, and also, you will not get sick or go hungry.
But those may happen because of your lack of discipline and laziness, yourlove for intrigue and politics, your indifference to saving for the future, your stubborn attitude.
If you love your country, let this message circulate so that many Filipinos could reflect about this, and CHANGE, ACT!
Posted by R.O. at 10:32 AM 4 comments Links to this post
Crocodile invasion
(I was with Rey and Thess in Bonifacio High Street last week. Wow, how swell and soci this place is! The spaciousness and spunky sculptures did it! What would Andres Bonifacio say to all that?!)
Crocs. Everywhere Crocs.
I quizzed the male attendant at the Crocs store in Bonifacio High Street on what this new post-Havaianas craze chinelas is all about. He immediately launched into an impressive sales talk that got me looking for the manager so I could recommend a raise. The guy said Crocs are neither rubber nor plastic, they're made of crosslite, or whatever the new material is named. He claimed Crocs are antimicrobial, anti-UV radiation, and anti-slip.
Whew, I thought, how come they never thought of making shoes like that?
I know your reaction constitutes a "But...!" I know: Crocs are the new shoes.
My interest is really more anthropomorphic than technological. Who would have thought that a bathroom fixture will soon be as high-end as this?
The first time I saw people I actually know wearing Crocs, it was Sam and Zaza wearing them bulldog-y clogs to a seminar. I thought, huh, it must be the latest in Vogue or GQ.
Then I saw O., an office executive, wearing clogs in her office fineries -- I hope not to work, at least officially.
Even Rey, who's hardly someone you might call fashion-conscious, succumbed to the temptation. ("But only because I'm going to the beach," he seems to counter.)
What's going on? Something's terribly wrong. I tried wearing a pair once, and it fit my feet snugly. I loved the feeling. But the footwear best suits someone in a bathrobe or an esoteric cosplay, not someone in formal office suits.
What's next with this holey, crocodile-y, reptilian rubbery thingie? Nuns wearing them with holey glee? The pope ditching his bloody-red Prada shoes in exchange for bloody-red Crocs? What?
Posted by R.O. at 9:57 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Friday, April 25, 2008
A map of emo stuff
Y.’s agony, 2
(Filed under: "A map of emotions")
I feel like sh*t. I don’t know what’s wrong from right anymore. My sense of guilt has departed from me. Doing things wrong has become second nature to me. Where have I gone wrong? It’s hard for me to trace my step back. What I know is falling feels so right while it lasts, while it feels so wrong right after. Then it feels really wrong long after that. But if I keep falling long enough, it becomes a pattern that what’s wrong seems right. Then I begin to feel nothing. And then I stop being bothered, even though, at the back of my mind, I may still feel something was amiss. Confusing? It is. That’s why I’m writing this.
It gets frustrating. It gets so bad when the pattern becomes a compulsion that I totally lose control. I become an animal. I give up even trying to be human by giving in again and again that it’s pointless to even pretend that I’m fighting. That’s the time I’m totally enslaved, possessed.
I want to sort things out. I still want to know the truth, to know what’s wrong from right. I guess I want peace. I know we can never be sure about things in life, but at least I want to get rid of this niggling feeling. I feel so dirty right now. And when I look back in the mirror, I don’t see the old me anymore, the one that I like, the one I’m really comfortable and quite proud of. I feel ugly right now. So ugly. I want to feel good again. I want to feel clean. I want to be cleansed and look good again. Maybe I should stop myself from falling back again. Or I’m sure I should. I don’t know. That’s why I need to write things down.
Life is a battle
(For Mike; filed under “A map of emotions”)
Life is a battle, brother. Carry on.
Move on, soldier.
Be a man. Fight.
Or at least be stoic. For there’s a battle to be won.
Set aside all feelings, whatever you feel right now.
You are a soldier.
A soldier has to be brave.
There will be blood. Gore. There will be mayhem.
Don’t be a slouch. Don’t be a wimp.
There’s more to come. Don’t expect the enemy to relent.
He’s more cunning than you thought.
What made you think it’s the enemy who’s behind it?
Could it be that, sometimes, the enemy is you?
Perish the self-destructive thought, or face defeat.
You can’t afford defeat.
Victory is the only option.
Have faith. Steel yourself.
Gird your loins.
Let fearlessness be your breastplate.
Let daring be your sandal in battle.
Keep a one-track mind.
Set your mind on just one goal: to win the war.
What do you expect life to be if not a series of fights.
This is not the life, lest you forget.
You'll remain a soldier until you die.
Even if you surrender, so long as you're alive, you'll still be a soldier.
A prisoner of war, maybe, but still a soldier.
Don’t be misled by the distractions.
These could be a ploy of the enemy, both outside and within.
Remember: You are your own worst enemy.
First, know thyself, thy Achilles heels. Then address each one of them.
Don’t forget to face your strengths, the better part of the truth about you, the truths you sometimes deny in moment of weakness, the truths you love to set aside.
Then move on from there.
Life is a battle. “On a battlefield, in the torture chamber, on a sinking ship, the issues that you are fighting for are always forgotten, because the body swells up until it fills the universe, and even when you are not paralysed by fright or screaming with pain, life is a moment-to-moment struggle against hunger or cold or sleeplessness, against a sour stomach or an aching tooth” (Orwell, 106).
Life is a battle. You’re a soldier, and you are to fight a battle of a lifetime.
Posted by R.O. at 7:28 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Creaky-bus scene
(Filipino life, as told to me by my cousin Rey)
At a decrepit provincial bus station along EDSA.
Passenger A (a lone male in his 40s, sound asleep, snoring at the alpha-wave level): “Zzzzzzz. Snorrrrrrrt. Zzzzzzzz. Snooorrrrtt.”
Balut vendor (enters bus, eager to make a killing to augment his meager income perhaps to feed his third mistress): “BALOOOOOOOOWT!!! BALOOOOOOOOWT!!!”
Passenger (rudely roused): “Put….!!!” (restrains himself).
Balut vendor (negotiates the entire length of the bus, finding no one interested; mistress' dinner, endangered): “BALOOOOOOOOWT!!! BALOOOOOOOOWT!!! BALOOOOOOOOWT!!!”
Balut vendor (goes back to the entrance and approaches Passenger A): “BALOOOOOOOOWT!!! BALOOOOOOOOWT!!!”
Passenger: HEH!!! ANG INGAY-INGAY MOH!!!
Posted by R.O. at 11:19 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Hell freezes over
(Attn.: CVJ, Jego)
Shocking news from C.P.: A Roman Catholic bishop seems to adopt the Orthodox view of hell (hell is only temporary, and Satan and the demons will repent, be forgiven, and be saved in the end).
This is the more traditional interpretation of hell: the wonderfully written essay The Population of Hell by Avery Cardinal Dulles.
Posted by R.O. at 9:34 AM 6 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Monday, April 21, 2008
Review: Ridiculing Catholics (and boy-bandism)
There are many really funny moments about being Catholic. Like, there are times when you are about to spit and suddenly remember you’ve just had communion. (You don’t spit the body of Christ, do you? You swallow back your spit.) Or when you see statues of the Blessed Virgin Mary clutching a rosary, and ask whether Mama Mary prays the Hail Mary too.
Nevertheless, as a Roman Catholic, I am sensitive and pious enough to get slighted when non-Catholics make fun of my faith (as when Borat made fun of Christ’s crucifixion). Only Catholics, I thought, have the right to make fun of Catholic things.
So, despite Arbet's promise of a good time, I was ready to bash this musical upon learning from Gibbs Cadiz’s review that it is a spoof of the Catholic religion, aside from a spoof of boy bands and Christianized pop culture. But my fears of sacrilege being made yet again in the holy name of art (hello, Dogma etc.) were a bit baseless, it turned out. I never imagined anyone can actually poke fun on such sensitive and heavy stuff as sin, evangelization, exorcism, and the reality of life's intense trials that bring about existential questions and spiritual desolation. I was completely mistaken, it turned out: A few scenes were indeed daring enough in their irreverence, profanity, and yes, raunchiness, but if the main objective is purely to spoof – which in essence is good-natured joshing - then The Altar Boyz pulls it off.
The minute the boys enter center stage, one never stops giggling guiltily that one’s shoulder blades get a thorough workout. The very idea of forming a Christian boy band is indeed hilarious enough, for who could conceive of such a thing in the first place when Catholicism has always been critical of the worldly Western pop culture? White-robed sacristans doing a yucky impression of ‘N Sync or, eew, Backstreet Boys? I don't know about you, but that’s really funny to me, especially if it’s one led by a boy in tight-fitting black shirt and an outsize silver cross on his breast (the better to drive away the devil and drive home the message, my dear); plus a lost kid, most likely an illegal, from Tijuana, Mexico, looking for his parents; a boy from da hiphop ‘hood spouting urbandictionary.com-worthy Negroid neologisms like “fo' shizzle” and “hishouze”; a screamingly gay boy with bleached hair; and, get this, their Jewish high school classmate who happens to have native songwriting talent.
An effectively nasty cast is thus made, with none except that lead guy named Matthew (is that your nephew Jego?) having a modicum of star quality, which is, of course, part of the joke (as my friend Malou pointed out). As the sacristy and altar apostles gyrate and do all that bad boy-band routine, one can’t help but be seized by fear of lighting striking and fits of fun laughter. If Greenbelt’s Onstage theater remains intact as of this writing, it’s maybe because the musical play’s irreverence is measured and never mean-spirited or malicious enough. The play, overall, comes off as merely a playful jibe at Catholics and Catholicism, not a material that openly risks the angry censure of the Catholic League of America or perhaps the ever-vigilant local version of the Defensores Fidei. If the intent is to satirize – which is, in essence, an expression of anger (valid or invalid) couched in humor – then The Altar Boyz is only a weak satire. Thankfully, though, it helps that Catholicism is not an insecure religion, it can afford to be heaped upon with insults from all directions, including those from atheists and its own adherents, whether the satire is lame or not.
Make no mistake, though: A typically pious churchgoer might not like the naughty wordplays and temerarious double entendres at all. I certainly wouldn’t recommend the whole family to go watch this play, for wholesome it ain’t. If you don’t want to risk your kid hearing a certain unmentionable word and an embarrassing innuendo in your presence, by all means, skip this one. But for those who have the tolerance and generosity for a dangerous brand of humor, hah, you know what to expect: The spirit of spoofy fun triumphs here, and such type of comedy, methinks, is not among the devil’s claims to fame. Besides, there is wisdom, I believe, in subjecting one’s faith to the humor test, if only to see its alleged flaws and inconsistencies according to the uninitiated or the apostates. Perhaps God Himself wouldn’t mind being treated to man’s twisted sense of humor from time to time. What is clear is that The Altar Boyz’s version of God is that of the Laughing Christ (have you seen that image yet?).
I strongly suspect the authors are themselves Catholic, though -- else why the intimate familiarity with Catholicism's inner dynamics?
What is even clearer is that the scriptwriters (playwrights?) have such a low regard for boy bands. You have to watch the show to see what I mean. The way the choreography (by someone from the Gary V's dance group) bashes the American-led pop concept, you’d be grateful it is now extinct (or is it really?). Boy-bandism was, of course, all the rage sometime back in the uninspired, prefab, and fake-boob parts of the 1990s and early 00s, although personally I see nothing wrong with boy bands, provided you’re a young boy who loves mindlessly enjoyable pop music and epileptic dance steps or a girl swooning over boyish charm. But, sure, I’ll agree readily that something is inherently wrong with boy-bandism, but only in so far as the music being inauthentic is concerned and the dance steps just a cheap staging of some uncredited dance instructor’s moves.
If I may dissuade one particular religious group from watching, I’d dissuade the Pentecostals because they were single-handedly bashed for homophobia or something (in boy band member-apostle Mark's catty aside). I thought that short gesture to be unfair not only because I love and am kinda grateful to the Pentecostals, having borrowed some concepts and practices from them, especially the concept of a “personal God” (which is not to say such a thing is absent in Catholicism; it’s just that it’s totally alien in my own milieu at the time), but also because – let’s face it – all religions are homophobic.
If I may take up a more serious issue with The Altar Boyz, it’s its failure to spoof Christianity as a whole. Why focus on the Catholics alone, given the playwrights’ confidence on Christianity’s prodigious ability to take insults? I was at least half-expecting a joke or two on the consequences of the Protestants’ rejection of traditional ecclesiastical art, for example, which alone is ripe for so many comedic possibilities. (See an old post of mine about the same affliction hitting some modern Catholic institutions: "Painstakingly ugly." I've briefly reported the same on Protestants, but I'd rather not lead you to that for the sake of world peace.) I was also expecting a jibe at the constricting environment of many Protestant and fundamentalist churches in terms of encouraging artistic creativity. And why not spoof Protestantism, which is America’s main version of Christianity? Catholicism is hardly ever a representative of the American scene. Then there’s the unrelenting edict, as it were, to “Hate one another,” the scandalous, constant, and exponential division in Christendom to consider. I know this fourth other suggestion would already border on the bilious, but the folly of the Christian churches' being obscurantist about pedophile priests and pastors is something that I thought is really worthy of ridicule. After all, the authors went so far as to render the most sacred things in a funny light, they might as well go all the way in the service of equal-opportunity swipes.
Barring that, though, The Altar Boyz gave me a good, if guilty, laugh and a chance to think and react.
Posted by R.O. at 8:48 PM 6 comments Links to this post
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Txt msg quilt
What do I come up with if I sew together the text messages I received in one day? The result, I'd find out, is fun, inspiring stuff:
"I am fine as I am." What do I care if others my age or even those not my age seem to be always getting ahead, reaping rewards they haven't even sought? Good for them, but why should that bother me? Perhaps it's not so much about being envious or bitter as much as I'm pitying myself. Where is this discontent coming from? If that's a sign that I should move on to a new direction, then by all means, I should follow where that leads me. If it's a symptom that my present heart is not in the right place, then I should be ashamed. Why should I be focused on what I don't have right now? "Worry," especially when too much, "won't change a bit of what's to come," especially the things beyond my control. I shouldn't measure my self-worth according to the approval of others, the standards of society. What matters is I'm okay with God. "Apart from that focus, everthing else is idolatry." I shall grow to be who I was meant to be, at my own pace. "Where I am right now is the best place and the best time to be." I am to "bloom where I am planted." Why do I care so much about what I should be getting out of this life? Is that the whole point of living? "Rivers don't drink the water they carry. Trees don't eat the fruits they bear. Clouds don't bathe in the rain they produce. (We are meant to give, even if we get nothing for it.) Measuring life by what others do may disappoint us, but measuring life by what we do wil make life maningful." Shouldn't I be hapy that I am unique in all creation, just like each and every creature? "Nature never repeats herself, and the possibilities of one human soul will never be found in another. I should celebrate who I am" and be "happy just being alive."
Posted by R.O. at 11:17 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Britishisms
In my new KPO job (currently on training), I will work on a UK-based project, so it's inevitable that, from Americanisms, I'd be grappling with those Briticisms that woudn't go extinct like the British monarchy. To review, here are the major terms I'd have to deal with a stiff upper lip:
grey, not gray
organisation, not organization
aluminium, not aluminum
sulphur, not sulfur
tyre, not tire
tonne, not ton
colour, not color
speciality, not specialty
programme, not program
anaesthesia, not anesthesia
catalogue, not catalog
diarrhoea, not diarrhea
licence (n.), not license
defence, not defense
fibre, not fiber
metre, not meter
mould, not mold
aeroplane, not airplane
catalogue, not catalog
manoeuvre, not maneuver
analyse, not analyze
co-operation, not cooperation
whilst, not while (if the following word starts with a vowel)
etc.
Posted by R.O. at 11:13 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Saturday, April 19, 2008
An old one: "IQ test on animals"
(Fwd'd mail, thanks to Bayi)
"The following test is a test for Intelligent People in which I have determined that you qualify.
The following short quiz consists of 4 questions and will tell you whether you are qualified to be a professional.
Scroll down for each answer. The questions are NOT that difficult. But don't scroll down UNTIL you have answered the question!
1. How do you put a giraffe into a refrigerator?
The correct answer is: Open the refrigerator, put in the giraffe, and close the door. This question tests whether you tend to do simple things in an overly complicated way.
2. How do you put an elephant into a refrigerator?
Did you say, Open the refrigerator, put in the elephant, and close the refrigerator? Wrong Answer. Correct Answer: Open the refrigerator, take out the giraffe, put in the elephant and close the door. This tests your ability to think through the repercussions of your previous actions.
3. The Lion King is hosting an animal conference. All the animals attend, except one. Which animal does not attend?
Correct Answer: The Elephant. The elephant is in the refrigerator. You just put him in there. This tests your memory. Okay, even if you did not answer the first three questions correctly, you still have one more chance to show your true abilities.
4. There is a river you must cross but it is used by crocodiles, and you do not have a boat. How do you manage it?
Correct Answer: You jump into the river and swim across. Have you not been listening? All the crocodiles are attending the animal conference. This tests whether you learn quickly from your mistakes.
According to Anderson Consulting (now known as Accenture), around 90% of the professionals they tested got all questions wrong, but many preschoolers got several correct answers. Anderson Consulting says this conclusively disproves the theory that most professionals have the brains of a four-year-old."
**
Battered
Speaking of tests, I've been through a battery of tests lately, as I tried to find other possible jobs. The tests were mostly humiliating, I thought, because those are stuff I teach. One test, though, stood out because it's a psychological test that I seem to have not taken yet: the Manchester Personality Test. Googling on it revealed that it "measures fourteen factors critical to work performance: Originality, Rule Consciousness, Openness to change, Assertiveness, Social Confidence, Empathy, Communicativeness, Independence, Rationality, Competitiveness, Conscientiousness, Perfectionism, Decisiveness, and Apprehension." I wonder if I passed that one.
News oddly amusing
"Bum salute to Hitler's home town
People living in Hitler's home town are furious after a neighbouring town erected a sculpture of a naked man pointing his bum at them.
The £200,000 sculpture, erected in the Bavarian town of Simbach on the German-Austrian border, shows a man riding on the top of a giant fish.
But officials in neighbouring Braunau, in Austria, are taking personally the fact that the man's naked bum is pointing in their direction.
Deputy Mayor Helmut Bogner, said: "This creature has his butt straight in our face. We, the people of Braunau, don't appreciate this gesture and we want it moved."
Richard Findl, mayor of Simbach, said of the work of art by sculptor Dominik Dengl: "I cannot understand the criticism. It is exaggerated.""
**
"Geek speak catches on
Calls are being made to recognise 'geek speak' as an official language after new research revealed it has become the fastest growing in Europe.
Experts claim about 100 new words are added to the language of technology, dubbed 'Nerdic', every year - three times as many as make it into the Oxford English Dictionary.
And the number of new Nerdic words will rise to 200 this year, according to research carried out by e-tailer pixmania.com to mark the 15th anniversary of the internet.
Ulric Jerome, the managing director of pixmania.com, said: "Technology has infiltrated our lives in many ways and at such a pace it is natural that it has developed a language of its own."
The researchers found that Nerdic contained the three core elements needed to define a language - words, phrases and pronunciation.
Stuart Miles, editor of gadget website Pocket-Lint.co.uk, said: "Technology has revolutionised the way we speak. With so many words and phrases being created all the time it's created a whole new way of communicating.
"Everyone knows what it means to Google something, and technology is moving at such a rapid pace these days that there are more and more new words coming into the English language.
"If you're really into technology like me, it is actually possible to have an entire conversation in Nerdic, although not everyone else would be able to understand it.""
(Bayi, I need da links!! Okay, will do the Googling.)
Posted by R.O. at 12:21 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
I’m a criminal
Apparently that’s what I am, judging from the way I’m treated as I get off the MRT Ayala station and walk my way to a part-time job (as medical copyeditor) somewhere in Herrera (now curiously named Rufino St.). As soon as I get off from the MRT coach and step onto the platform, I am assaulted by a series of security guard inspections as though I am about to enter Fort Knox. It feels like sexual molestation.
First case of sex harrassment: SM Makati Mall. The message behind the blue-and-white guard’s metal detector is unmistakable: I am presumed a terrorist, and I enter under that presumption.
Next stop: Entrance to Glorietta Mall near National Bookstore. Another major portal that issues a bleeping sound tells me I’m not okay, and they’re not through with me yet. I have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that I’m no coup plotter carrying bombs.
Next stop: Landmark Department Store entrance. What the heck. Isn’t all that earlier trouble enough? Guess not -- at least not to the invisible Big Brother. Okay. But I’m clean, see. No trace of RDX.
Next: I make a pit stop at the john near the overly French-sounding “La Bagaggerie” section of Landmark. Along the way there, it’s no different from being trapped inside the women’s lingerie department. I think there’s no loitering guard around, but I am mistaken. There is one, perhaps awaiting if he can catch a secret sex molester preying on young boys or making like old George Michael with a fellow male stranger.
(The last time I was harrassed that way, I was applying for a job at the US Embassy.)
Next: Powerbooks, Greenbelt. The lady guard at the door is different: She smiles. But nonetheless, it's a smile with malice aforethought: It turns out I’m a potential book thief and plagiarist too. I must surrender at the gate whatever earthly belonging and dignity I have left intact.
Next: The nice, long walkway leading to Herrera St. Ah, heaven, finally. No one bothering me... until I get near an ATM machine, that is. I happen to need to withdraw some cash for lunch (and a dangerously sweet Krispy Kreme or two nearby). I’m a potential ATM highjacker or petty cash embezzler, no doubt. I must be kept under a close watch.
Last stop: My new workplace’s entrance: I am demanded my company ID. I say I’m a newbie, and I namedrop my friend’s name complete with the honorific, like an Ali Baba password. Apparently, I am either a dangerous corporate spy or someone who’s probably guilty of a hate crime like a guy surnamed with something unspellable like Kacszynski.
Wait, there’s one last last: The actual office’s door, where yet another guy stands guard and pries me open for possible cocaine capsules lodged within my colon.
After I am stitched back, I walk in and reach my cubicle, only to be told to pass by the 50th floor of PBCom Tower nearby (the tallest building in the land), where the HRD holds office.
Getting there -- yes, you guessed it right -- I am asked to surrender an ID and wear a Visitor’s ID in exchange, before I can ever board the express zone elevator and enjoy the wonderful view from the top. I can’t help but wonder whether my real surname sounds odd enough or too foreign or what. I can just imagine how someone named Mahmood or Abbas is bodily searched and prejudged as someone who has suspiciously just finished a flight simulation course.
On a very bad day, that’s apparently who I am to all of them: a petty criminal. I am wanted, pursued by a meticulously organized, metro-wide dragnet.
But maybe I should thank terrorists because it created a million new jobs, jobs that can't help but presume guilt in the holy name of security.
Posted by R.O. at 9:07 PM 3 comments Links to this post
Manila needs umbrella
(Typing test by way of saying, Hello blog!)
Manila is heaving with the horror of heat and humidity. No, it’s melting, like slabs of butter do. Its ice cubes turn feverish. Its A/Cs go on a hot spell, its fans blow hot and cold.
My room transforms into an oven. The lights blow off. The floor of my living room is flooded, but only with my perspiration, which soon dries up, turning into salt. I take a bath ten times a day, and drink lots of Gatorade even if I’m not an athlete out to cure his cramps. The food on the table rots in mere seconds the fungi do the ballroom dance. The bread first gets moldy and later gets toasted without being microwaved. Powder, I need more talcum powder. Or halo-halo. More halo-halo. (And more bottles of antiperspirant too.)
The pavement liquefies back into tar strewn with macadam. Already, people are running around with only lettuce leaves for their privates.
(A news report says boils grow all over the skin of prisoners.)
Even the mosquitoes take off their jackets and head for the beach. The pet cats, well, they board a plane to the nearest place where there’s an infinity pool. Entire colonies of ants die off. Hyperthermia, surely.
Rihanna (the Barbadan singer of that catchy “umbrella ella ella” song) would be surprised how popular her song here is. If Bayani Fernando is truly smart, he’d convert all those tarpaulin ads, including those with his blown-up mugshot, into a giant tent for his globally warmed, or sweltering, city.
I think we should all learn from those ugly frogs and fishes that hibernate during droughts and pretend to be half-dead, to swim or croak back to life only after the first rain comes.
I remember somebody telling the story of how Ferdinand Marcos issued an edict we can all draw inspiration from: one suspending typhoons from hitting our shores.
Let’s suspend the sun from smiling too much on us.
Posted by R.O. at 8:59 PM 2 comments Links to this post
Shift F5
I’ve temporarily suspended my tutoring career in favor of other jobs because, much as it has been the best job I’ve ever had, it also drained me big time. But, yes, I still enjoy learning new stuff out of it. Here are essays I enjoyed lately because they can be used as models of good essay writing:
“The Yellow Ribbon” by Pete Hamill – yes, that story that inspired that old jolly song that tells a touching story (a song that became an unofficial theme leading to the original EDSA “People Power” revolution); “Dad” by Andrew H. Malcolm; "Lou's Place" by Beth Johnson - the characterization of such a quirky place and character is mentally indelible; “How to Do Well on a Job Interview” by Glenda Davis; “Taming the Anger Monster” by Anne Davidson; Born to be Different?” by Camille Lewis; “Television Addiction” by Marie Winn; “Wait Divisions” by Tom Bodett – practically a guide to how to write a wonderful conclusion; "Why are Students Turned Off?" by Casey Banas; “Propaganda Techniques in Today’s Advertising” by Ann McClintock; “How to Make it in College, Now that You’re Here” by Brian O’Keeney; “College Lectures: Is Anybody Listening?” by David Daniels; “Seven Ways to Keep the Peace at Home” by Daniel A. Sugarman.
“Ban the Things, Ban them All” by Molly Ivins – By golly, the wittiest writer of them all. Consider this opening, and this is just the first few lines of this hilarious gem:
“Guns. Everywhere guns.”
“Let me start this discussion by pointing out that I am not anti-gun. I’m pro-knife. Consider the merits of the knife.”
Molly Ivins is the kind of writer who’ll make you agree with her just because she made you laugh. Too bad she's gone away for good.
**
Meanwhile, my new full-time job is now based in QC, where I get to meet a certain newspaper's deskman, among other wonderful new officemates. Naturally I endlessly grill said deskman about the MSM industry, about all the fine details I've missed. Not that I need to do so, 'coz he's such a firm believer in volunteerism. :p
Posted by R.O. at 8:55 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Manila's Tarp Central
(Wow Philippines! Ang iniiit!!!)
There's something wrong with TV actor Dingdong Dantes's crotch in his fairly scandalous Bench underwear ad near Guadalupe Bridge: It was obviously Photoshopped!
This and other anatomically incorrect things are some of the things you notice as you pass through Guadalupe Bridge to go to and from work.
The other things are less obvious but even more...wrong:
1. You don't wear undies in the beach like that, you wear trunks or beach shorts.
2. You certainly don't pose like that in your briefs while sunning in public.
3. And you certainly don't blow up such a pic in incredibly large proportion. The right place for underwear ads is inside underwear stores or undies/lingerie sections of department stores, if not on the packaging itself.
4. And how can you justify being barraged by gigantic ads like that whichever direction you looked when you're already being barraged by a thousand commercials everyday on TV? The way the ads are outsized, you'd think we have aliens from ouer space as target audience. (Does E.T. ever wear blood-red Bench briefs?)
5. What's the sense of building a steel structure that rivals the ancient ziggurats in a city where the national hero's statue is just this tall, when said structure is not a shrine to anyone or anything but to a tarpaulin ad that most likely spouts modern-day lies, or at least socially sanctioned propaganda (quick, Google and review Jib Fowles's 15 basic appeals or advertising strategies) and will most likely endanger motorists with roving eyes and commuters during tropical tornados if it's not tempting the suicidal to end it all?
I think we should reclaim that beautiful bend of Pasig River and make this place a real tourist attraction by restoring some amount of shame. Losing those tarp ads will surely mean losing lots of money, but we could earn better with a nice tourist attraction, couldn't we? Or maybe there's a place for gigantic ads, after all. But please, let it be any place that's already very ugly to begin with, not something lovely like that part of Guadalupe.
Posted by R.O. at 12:27 PM 5 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, April 09, 2008
"Humans are pretty mixed-up creatures"
(Recent readings)
"Most of us post-Freudians are at least vaguely familiar with the mechanisms of denial, repression, and the projection of blame onto others. These are the means by which
we preserve our fragile self-esteem by blocking out, or splitting off from our awareness, behavior that is reprehensible. By imposing a blanket ban on anything potentially blameworthy, we prevent ourselves from ever becoming fully aware of significant actions in our lives. As a result, we do not ponder them and seek to understand why we acted in such a way. Although we seem to be self-protecting, we are really very hard on ourselves, quick to dismiss certain actions as unconscionable. If we had the courage to examine them more closely, we would discover, more often than not, that even our worst actions may have some admixture of good, just as our best deeds are sometimes tinged with imperfection. Humans are pretty mixed up creatures. We do not have the capaicity to be absolutely good or absolutely bad. This means that when we act badly, it is important to understand what is going on, so that we can reduce the level of vice without crippling the good intentions that may have been operative. ...
- Michael Casey in Fully Human, Fully Divine
Posted by R.O. at 1:59 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Body vs. spirit
(Recent readings)
"The ancient monks placed before their followers the gospel ideal of purity and undividedness of heart and advocated an extreme asceticism to promote its realization. It was a noble project, worthy of our admiration. The only problem is that it did not and cannot work. Even those hoary heroes of the spiritual life found that, at the end of long decades of spiritual warfare, the most that could be hoped for were occasional brief truces or breathing spaces. Even those who devote their entire lives to living in holiness soon discover that complete integration of energies is impossible while we are still "in the body." This inner conflict means that we remain permanently imperfect and we will pass into eternity imperfect. Our only hope is to rely on the mercy of God. In a sense, this necessary transition from self-reliance to ultimate dependence on God is the meaning and purpose of the struggle. Victory over our vice is an illusory ideal. If our sins are the only things that make us rely on God, then it seems unwise to get rid of them too quickly.
"'There is no reason to suppose that an entity built, bottom up, from the ambitions of individual genes will be harmonious.' We were created as a war zone ... If we are not to be overwhelmed by the attack of interior and often invisible assailants, we must understand the field of battle.
...
"To live a spiritual life means accepting and honoring the "body" and being prepared to negotiate. This realistic willingness to compromise involves recognizing that the "body" has its own distinctive ambitions, and not overestimating our own capacity to subsume or subordinate these."
- Michael Casey, in Fully Human, Fully Divine
Posted by R.O. at 1:42 PM 0 comments Links to this post
The vice of singularitas
(Recent readings)
"[Singularitas, a term used by the ancient monastic authors, refers to] cutting oneself off from the community by denying to others the right to have any input about the way I live, to make any demands on me, or to restrict my freedom in any way. Since the late nineteenth century, the word "solipsism" has been used in philosophical circles to denote a radical subjectivism which emphasizes personal experience to the extent that other people have only secondary significance. In Vatican documents and in many European languages, this tendency is termed "individualism." The word has some currency though, perhaps it would be better avoided in English if a better substitute were available. In our languge, the term is more often assumed to refer to no more than appropriate self-assertion, or a fondness for doing things one's own way or harmless eccentricity. However, when Pope John Paul II denounces individualism as something that "leads to the denial of the very idea of human nature," he was speaking about something far more destructive than mere personal style. Real individualism tramples on the rights of others, destroys the foundation of human community, and inevitably corrupts and saddens those who embrace it."
- Michael Casey, in Fully Human, Fully Divine
Posted by R.O. at 12:51 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Psychoanalyze this
My friends and I are into helping interpret people's dreams this time. Here's one example, for starters.
"It was a stormy night -- a night of heavy downpour, lightning flashes, roaring thunders. Young wild animals of all species in a nearby place (an open game reserve, maybe) were caught by surprise. They were utterly disturbed. In panic, they invaded my place as I lay in bed about to sleep. They created much noise. They crowded my frontyard, settling in trees and under the shade. Yet they still felt unprotected. In pity, I opened the gate, and they all rushed in and stampeded into my backyard -- young rhinos, young hippos, cubs, colts, nestlings, all of them. I didn't fear the lovely animals maybe because they're all too young to inflict harm. Finally they found refuge. A few of them, like a pair of immature tarsiers, even ventured into a little room in the garden tended by someone else. These few 'adventurous' younglings were ready to be touched and tamed. My place was like Noah's ark."
Comments:
I don't like J.'s Bosconian interpretation of this dream sequence at all. Since he was a product of Don Bosco High School, he said he saw the wild animals in terms of one of Don Bosco's dreams, where wild animals represented the wildness inside of the person, which he chooses to give refuge within. It sounded so...wrong.
I like M.'s interpretation better: The subject/dreamer is finally at home, at peace, with himself, and he seems to have this longing to tame wild young things and provide them shelter. The dream looks like a calling to serve people in a new way.
My own interpretation is that the dreamer is anxious or overwhelmed about feeling (or being) at home with his wild side.
Posted by R.O. at 10:11 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Monday, April 07, 2008
Magiting ka nga ba, Pilipino?

I wonder how you'll react to National Artist's F. Sionil Jose's diagnosis of our national malaise: We are poor because we, particularly our elite, have not been moral and nationalistic.
It's quite hard to react to the speech because I can't discern its thesis more readily than I'd like to, and the essay doesn't seem to be unified to me. Correct me if I'm wrong, please. I can sense a lot of wrong things in what he's saying; I just can't articulate them for now.
(Update: Turns out this speech is an old one, delivered back in 2005 (or around that time), and it's title is "Revolution and the University of the Philippines." Here are reactions at the time from three distinguished folks.)
**
Gratitude corner
I've been a fan of wonderful essays lately. Essays can be as powerful as poems, short stories, and novels in rousing the emotion and bringing certain truths to life. Here's the loot I've found (hope everything is Googleable):
Thomas Merton's "Rain and the Rhinoceros," a complex yet easy-to-follow metaphorical essay about "solitude, personal freedom and the nature of joy"; I read it, though, as a gentle indictment of urban 'civilization.' Faith McNulty's "Mouse," a charming portrait of an otherwise icky subject, her pet mouse (pest to everyone else). McNulty is a nature writer for "the most urbane" of mags, The New Yorker.
The rest are used as essay writing models in college writing classes across America:
Bertrand Russell's "Three Passions" - a model of coherence and unity -- and honest writing. Alex Haley's "Thank You" - a different kind of Thanksgiving Day essay, which is an epistolary. Dick Gregory's "Shame" - the one essay that made me laugh and cry due to its pathos and brilliance, like discovering an intelligent jazz/soul piece in the attic; the delicacy of its topic (extreme poverty, embarrassment, and sense of dignity) makes this particular essay a treasure of humanity. Roger Wilkins' "I Became Her Target" - the kind of schoolboy memoir you'd first hurt deeply for to be able to write; a racially charged essay. John McMurtry's "Smash Thy Neighbor" - a contrarian look at a certain most cherished, all-American sport: football. George Orwell's "A Hanging" - a spare, non-maudlin, but haunting account of capital punishment in Burma. Russel Baker's "In My Day" - a nostalgia trip with a delicate, truthful twist about the supposed invincibility of our parents. Haven Kimmell's "A Legenday Moment" - a very witty and funny narrative about her neurotic parents who deserve each other. Beth Johnson's "The Professor is a Dropout" - the nicely developed and unforgettable tale of Guadalupe Quintanilla, a Mexican-American who's now at the top in America after being brushed aside as a moron due to her initial difficulty with the English language. Deems Taylor's "The Monster" - a gripping, unexpectedly mean valentine to the genius of Wagner. Mary Sherry's "In Defense of the F Word" - a proposal that failing students be given an F so as to teach them right and not cheat them of what proper education means. Joyce Garity's "Is Sex All that Matters?" - zooms in on the case study of a young woman, to illustrate the influence of the barrage of "sexual images in media on young people's behavior and dreams." Joan Dunayer's "Here's to Your health" - a comparison/contrast between "the glamorous 'myth' about alcohol, as presented in ads and pop culture, with the reality -- which is far less appealing." Beth Johnson's "Bombs Bursting in Air" - a ponderous yet fluid and easy piece exploring this question: "Is it possible for us to protect ourselves from the grief and pain of life?"
Meanwhile, I'm still in the middle of thumbing through this piece, which is one of the finest literary works ever made in English, at least according to one professor: Jonathan Swift's "A modest proposal: For preventing the children of poor people in Ireland from being a burden to their parents or country, and for making them beneficial to the public." This is a material that's pertinent to the most recent manufactured crisis of our time: the so-called rice crisis or food crisis. (Aw, come one now, y'all. Stop lying, will you?)
Btw, I haven't read The New Yorker for months now, so I'm happy to grab a copy and even happier to know that it's the food issue of 2007, which I read from cover to cover. In this issue, I've read David Gopnik writing about "localism" (eating only the foods within your square mile of locality) as extreme sport, Calvin Trillin on Singapore's street foods, David Sedaris on not knowing how to cook, someone else about a sleek fine wine fraudster, another writer's "life list" on wildlife eats (accompanied by an sumptuously yucky illlustration of a endangered species pie), Lara (?) Vapnyar's entertaining fiction on two ESL students, "Luda and Milena," among other juicy morsels/offerings. Sasha Frere-Jones reviews the music Manu Chao and Joan Acocella critiques the latest translation of Dante's Paradiso.
And: I need to read the following assignments, which are not essays but full-blown books. Novels!: Shakespeare's Hamlet - because students are constantly assigned to write a literary analysis on this classic this time of the year. George Orwell's 1984 - finally, a super-cheap copy of a literary and sociopolitical writing gem! Edith Wharton's House of Mirth - to see what the fuss is all about, why the novel made it to the top 100 in a certain list; good luck to me, and thanks to Annie for the copy. I say good luck because I couldn't stand Jane Austen's convoluted prose and thoughts in Sense and Sensibility (to think I love convoluting in the name of deliberate obfuscation), although Charles Dickens I can take anytime. Speaking of Dickens,' I saw a copy of A Tale of Two Cities, and I was unfazed; I'd try reading this one too.
**
Over the weekened, I saw Freestyle perform live (for free), had a nice haircut at a tattoo shop in Goldcrest with J.R., and discovered a wonderful food supplement that solved all my health ills: First Vita Plus (which contains malunggay, kulitis, sili, saluyot, and kamote leaf extracts), thanks to my old friend, Ai, who's a doctor and highly recommends this invention by former DOH Sec. Dr. Galvez Tan. (No, this is not a paid ad.)
Nice YouTube vid
Finally, I hate ads, but I love this one.
Posted by R.O. at 10:27 AM 16 comments Links to this post
Saturday, April 05, 2008
Prerequisites to healing
"If you want to be healed, be humble. Be humble enough to forgive those who've hurt you, and to ask forgiveness from those you've hurt."
That's what a "healing priest," Fr. G., told us in last night's Mass. He said that's what God 'told' him in prayer when he received the gift of healing without even requesting it. He said he felt a mysterious warmth radiating from his head down to his whole body as he received the gift.
Once, while he was in Jerusalem, he said, he happened to meet the controversial Fr. Fernando Suarez, a far more popular "healing priest," in the same hotel he was staying. (I use double quote pairs because these priests dislike the term very much, saying it's God who heals, not them, which is right.) Fr. Suarez, he said, asked his advice on what to do amidst all those brickbats he earned in Manila after being given full media exposure here. Fr. G. said he told him to "keep your ministry simple," which he said includes not inviting media attention. He knew what he was saying, he said, because he used to be a mediaman himself.
"Forgive. Leave the justice to God."
"Can you imagine if we have forgiven Marcos? We wouldn't be in this situation now." He implied that, to the forgiver, the act of forgiving awaits tremendous, unforeseen blessings, apart from the healing itself.
He then related how he was able to help a blind man see again after the man said he was forgiving his fellow sailor who, after a heated argument one day, threw acid at his face. He lost his retinas, and seeing again would have been too impossible, Fr. G. said, and yet the man saw again.
Of course, Fr. G. didn't say anything new. That's what all these phenomenal "healers" of our time are saying in unison even if they didn't exactly eyeball and meet as an egroup (there are at least four others in this country whose works are more or less publicized). That's something expected anyway of anybody who claims to be Christian. What was fairly new to me was the insight that we could have a lot of institutional hurts to forgive as well, apart from the personal pains we endure out of all the insults, misjudgments, and cutting remarks hurled against us and all the unfair actions done to us.
Fr. G. made me realize how gargantuan the hurts I personally have to forgive, in case I haven't let go. Just recalling everything I've written is enough to overwhelm me: the unspeakable crimes committed by the bayonet-wielding Japanese during the war (when I wasn't even born yet); the wide-ranging devastation committed by the Marcos regime in our country and on our people's sense of morality and our future; the murder of the nation's brightest youth during the First Quarter Storm; the plunder of this nation's resources; the profound injustice I perceive to be inherent in how we administer justice, treat labor, hire workers, deliver healthcare, do business, give education, etc.; the extremely depressing socioeconomic condition and prospects in this country; the need or the constant pressure to ditch one's citizenship and work or live abroad to have a decent life, where you can at least pretend there's a bright future ahead; the cringe-inducing threats of extreme Islamists and other terrorists; the harmful experiments of military adventurists; down to the most recent, deeply hurting crimes: this nation's top leaders behaving as though EDSA never happened, and the mind-boggling lies and dirty political games of the Arroyo administration which have destabilized Philippine democracy. Even these things can scar the soul deeply. In the name of forgiveness, I have to swallow everything, no matter how bitter-tasting, even through my fear that my act of forgiveness might be misconstrued as to mean acceptance of what is wrong, acceptance of what is evil. (It's not that, of course; it's all about not doing things out of hate or desire for vengeance.)
I forgot to ask Fr. G., "Where do I go from here (forgiving and asking forgiveness)?" I don't know whether that's a good question to ask, though. What matters at the moment is I receive the healing that I've been pining for. Maybe the Spirit will teach me how to do things right the next time. Maybe reminding myself of the basics of the Christian faith is enough. I know the basic teaching to "love thy enemies" sounds so deceptively simple, which doesn't translate to stupidly accepting everything one's enemy has to say, but always means following the path to peace anyway, which is the tricky part. What's worst, the path to forgiveness might even take an entire lifetime to take faithfully, but I am willing to try again even though I've been down this road several times (70 x 7?) before, forgiving everything mentioned above, on top of all the offenses done to me on the personal level, each a deep wound, a gash.
Now, about asking forgiveness from those I have offended... Well...
Maybe that's the more definitive key to forgiveness: the thought that I myself am not lily-white. Forgiveness should be far more doable with that thought, although asking forgiveness is just as difficult to do as forgiving one's offender, unless I really humble myself.
Posted by R.O. at 8:47 AM 8 comments Links to this post
Jesus vs. Muhammad
Because the Islamists want to censor the world by telling the UN to declare anything that criticizes Islam as a crime, we'll acquiese to their request by presenting somebody's compare/contrast essay. A totally objective look, nothing emotionally critical, just the plain facts of history, according to the original sources themselves, not according to biased atheists and fundamentalist Christians: Jesus vs. Muhammad
N.B.: I am not posting this out of hate.
Posted by R.O. at 8:27 AM 2 comments Links to this post
Friday, April 04, 2008
"The glory of Easter"
(An ancient anonymous homily on the Easter mystery in simple yet soaring language)
Something strange is happening - there is a great silence on earth today, a great silence and stillness. The whole earth keeps silence because the King is asleep. The earth trembled and is still because God has fallen asleep in the flesh and he has raised up all who have slept ever since the world began. God has died in the flesh and hell trembles with fear.(via C.P.)
He has gone to search for our first parent, as for a lost sheep. Greatly desiring to visit those who live in darkness and in the shadow of death, he has gone to free from sorrow the captives Adam and Eve, he who is both God and the son of Eve. The Lord approached them bearing the cross, the weapon that had won him the victory. At the sight of him Adam, the first man he had created, struck his breast in terror and cried out to everyone: “My Lord be with you all.” Christ answered him: “And with your spirit.” He took him by the hand and raised him up, saying: “Awake, O sleeper,and rise from the dead, and Christ will give you light."
“I am your God, who for your sake have become your son. Out of love for you and for your descendants I now by my own authority command all who are held in bondage to come forth, all who are in darkness to be enlightened, all who are sleeping to arise. I order you, O sleeper,to awake. I did not create you to be held a prisoner in hell. Rise from the dead, for I am the life of the dead. Rise up, work of my hands, you who we recreated in my image. Rise, let us leave this place, for you are in me And I am in you; together we form only one person and we cannot be separated.
"For your sake I, your God, became your son; I, the Lord, took the form of a slave; I, whose home is above the heavens, descended to the earth and beneath the earth. For your sake, for the sake of man, I became like a man without help, free among the dead. For the sake of you, who left a garden, I was betrayed to the Jews in a garden, and I was crucified in a garden.
“See on my face the spittle I received in order to restore to you the life I once breathed into you. See there the marks of the blows I received in order to refashion your warped nature in my image.On my back see the marks of the scourging I endured to remove the burden of sin that weighs upon your back. See my hands, nailed firmly to a tree,for you who once wickedly stretched out your hand to a tree.
“I slept on the cross and a sword pierced my side for you who slept in paradise and brought forth Eve from your side. My side has healed the pain in yours. My sleep will rouse you from your sleep in hell. The sword that pierced me has sheathed the sword that was turned against you.
“Rise, let us leave this place. The enemy led you out of the earthly paradise. I will not restore you to that paradise, but I will enthrone you in heaven. I forbade you the tree that was only a symbol of life, but see, I who am life itself am now one with you. I appointed cherubim to guard you as slaves are guarded, but now I make them worship you as God. The throne formed by cherubim awaits you, its bearers swift and eager. The bridal chamber is adorned, the banquet is ready, the eternal dwelling places are prepared, the treasure houses of all good things lie open. The kingdom of heaven has been prepared for you from all eternity."
Posted by R.O. at 12:02 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Bayani Fernando's mugshot "uglifying Manila"
I can't help but laugh over this bit. Finally, someone's aesthetic sensibilities have been officially offended. But I was expecting reactions to the MMDA Chair's preference for pink, ugly color combinations, and "MMDA art", not objections to his face or his Big Brotherly stance of late.
Seriously, I've been expecting something more along the lines of, "But is it art?" Really, I've been staunchly pro-Bayani since Day One, and won't even hesitate to call him a hero, except in those instances where his boys act like little Hitlers on the road when dealing with those poor illegal vendors. (Won't dialogue work?) But I won't let him escape unscathed with this one. Whoever conceptualized "MMDA art" should give an answer to Cong. Golez's objection.
I mean, have you seen those primary-color geometric works lately? Even my Dora the Explorer-loving kindergarten niece JC can do that better. In a country with overabundant artists, from painters like Malang, Ang Kiu-Kok, Manansala, Botong Francisco, Rene Villanueva to Arturo Luz, Ayala, Gabby Barredo, et al. to graphic designers (ever heard of a group like Electrolychee?), grafitti artists, urban planners, etc., the MMDA has been punishing us, especially our eyes. And that's a charitable way of putting it.
I suggest Chairman Bayani make a quick trip to the National Museum (is it still closed to the public?) for some suggestions. Maybe someone like John Silva can make a better rant than this. If Fernando wants simple, practical art, I'd personally recommend something like the works of Piet Mondrian, Jackson Pollock, Kandinsky, and the like. The ceramic-tile (?) bas reliefs along EDSA look okay, though.
The Filipino people deserve the best, nothing less than the works of our national artists. After all, what are artists and art for if confined inside the National Museum?
And, oh, yeah, may everybody stop using his or her mugshot for veiled political campaign purposes, especially if he or she is not, say, Marianne dela Riva or say, Jay Cuenca or JC de Vera (had to research those new faces hogging the gigantic EDSA Guadalupe billboards (I thought those danged billboards had been declared illegal and must be resized to online avatar size before a new tornado hits?!)). Having one's face blown up like that, and strategically positioned everywhere like that, is just too...fascistic, which should remind us of dictators with gigantic egos: Marcos, Mao Tse-Tung, Saddam Hussein, Stalin, and Kim Il-Sung. Chairman Bayani will certainly find the mere association with these names distasteful, won't he?
Posted by R.O. at 9:31 AM 4 comments Links to this post
Walls come tumbling down
"Cyprus tears down barricade (Ledra St.) dividing island"
This happy bit of news reminds me of a project I've meant to do but couldn't: Construct a timeline of walls that have been built and have been torn down, walls of international political significance. Walls have always looked ironic and sad to me, especially in this day and age of globalization. I intend to research the date each respective wall was constructed and the date it was torn down. This should be easy to do, as there aren't that many walls throughout world history. Let me have a quick rundown, or has Wikipedia beat me up to it:
- Great Wall of China, to protect the North from invaders - "The Great Wall of China is a series of stone and earthen fortifications in China, built, rebuilt, and maintained between the 5th century BC and the 16th century to protect the northern borders of the Chinese Empire during the rule of successive dynasties. "
- Hadrian's Wall (England-Scotland border): "Hadrian's Wall is a stone and turf fortification built by the Roman Empire across the width of modern-day England. It was the second of three such fortifications built across Great Britain, the first being Gask Ridge and the last the Antonine Wall. All three were built to prevent military raids by the Pictish tribes (ancient inhabitants of Scotland) to the north, to improve economic stability and provide peaceful conditions in the Roman province of Britannia to the south, and to mark physically the frontier of the Empire."
- Trajan's Wall - "Trajan's Wall (Valul lui Traian in Romanian) is a complex of valla in Eastern Europe: in Romania, Moldova and Ukraine. Contrary to the name and popular belief, the ramparts were not built by Romans during Trajan's reign. Archaeologists believe that Troys wall may have been small and week, this made Troy an easy target."
- Barricade separating Greek and Turkish Cypriots (1958-2008)
- Iron Curtain - "The "Iron Curtain" was the symbolic, ideologic, and physical boundary dividing Europe into two separate areas from the end of World War II until the end of the Cold War, roughly 1945 to 1991. "
- Berlin Wall dividing Germany - (Aug. 13, 1961-1989) - "The Berlin Wall was a barrier separating West Berlin from East Berlin and the rest of East Germany ...as part of the Iron Curtain."
- The racial wall of apartheid dividing South Africa - "Apartheid is an Afrikaans word meaning "separation" or "being apart". It is usually used to describe a policy that existed in South Africa from 1948 to 1994. This system was used to mistreat and deny rights to non-white people."
- The invisible wall (demilitarized zone) separating the Koreas - "The 38th parallel was first suggested as a dividing line for Korea in 1902"
- Palestine-Israeli wall (2007?) - "The Israeli West-Bank barrier is a barrier being constructed by Israel consisting of a network of fences with vehicle-barrier trenches surrounded by an on average 60 meters wide exclusion area (90%) and up to 8 meters high concrete walls (10%).[1] It is located mainly within the West Bank, partly along the 1949 Armistice line, or "Green Line" between Israel and Jordan which now demarcates the West Bank. Supporters argue that the barrier is a necessary tool protecting Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism, including suicide bombing attacks[.]"
- US-Mexican border wall against illegal immigrants (2007?) - "The United States–Mexico barrier is actually several separation barriers designed to prevent illegal movement across the U.S.-Mexico border. The barriers were built as part of three larger "Operations" to taper transportation of illegal drugs manufactured in Latin America and illegal immigration: Operation Gatekeeper in California, Operation Hold-the-Line in Texas, and Operation Safeguard in Arizona."
(All quotes from Wikipedia)
Posted by R.O. at 9:08 AM 5 comments Links to this post
Thursday, April 03, 2008
Txt msgs
I got kinda beautiful txt msgs -- kinda in the sense that they are truthful but won't end up riling certain people, just like the pages of Chicken Soup for the Soul.
Old Abe and failure
"At 31, this man FAILED in business. At 32, was DEFEATED in a legislative race. At 34, FAILED again in business. At 35, his girlfriend DIED. At 36, had a NERVOUS BREAKDOWN. At 38, LOST another election. At 43, 46, and 48, LOST Congressional races. At 55, LOST a senatorial race. At 60, he was ELECTED President of the US. He is Abraham Lincoln. You're never really a failure until you give up trying." (from Gorgeous)
Singles motto
"'I am wanted by many, I am looking at some, I am taken by none, but I am waiting for one.' - the motto of singles." (from Gorgeous)
Ang alamat ng banana cue
"Minsan nagtalo-talo ang mga saging kung sino pinakamasarap. Sabi ni Latundan, small but sweet siya. Sabi naman ni Lakatan, big but sweeter siya. Nalungkot si Saba kasi di siya sweet, kailangan pa nyang mailuto, atbp., kaya nagwalk-out siya. Pero nasalubong niya si Brown Sugar. Ikwinento nya ang nangyari. Tumawa si Brown Sugar at sabi, 'It doesn't matter how sweet you are, what matters is how you make others special because of you.'" (from James)
Posted by R.O. at 1:42 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
Labeling theory
Definition of terms
Labeling theory - The tags or labels we have on people impact on their self-perception or how other people look at them, thus affecting the labelled persons' behavior, prompting them to either deviance or conformity.
Stigma - anything that discredits a person’s acceptance into normal, mainstream society.
Deviance - the violation of social norms or rules (written or unwritten?).
Primary deviance - "any general deviance before the deviant is labeled as such."
Secondary deviance - "any action that takes place after primary deviance as a reaction to the institutions" or "when someone acts like others say he/she is"
Tertiary deviance - out and out commission of a crime within the same-labelled group after being labelled
Posted by R.O. at 11:38 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Tuesday, April 01, 2008
Peace, love, detente
Okay, I concede I may have fed myself lately with nothing but extremist stuff and I may have been gulty of tuning out moderate voices (even though I never censored anyone's comment). I'm sorry if I have commited a mistake. I am willing to learn more of the other side. I won't be a party to more hatred and violence. This world has more than enough of it. I am after the truth, but I'm also pro-love, pro-peace, pro-joy, pro-prosperity, and pro-everything that's universally good. I'll refrain from my favorite topic for now until I get sober. Peace!
Posted by R.O. at 7:10 PM 7 comments Links to this post
"Reparative drive" theory
How same-sex attraction (SSA) occurs or develops, according to Genderwholeness.com (as reworded):
Defensive Detachment. Defense mechanism as a result of rejection (perceived or real), by the father or father figure (or male authority figure). We end up rejecting everything about the person who has hurt us, especially his maleness, and this rejection is extended to be a rejection by all men, including all male peers. Feelings of rejection can result from various causes: verbal abuse, physical violence, sex abuse, porn, father absence, over-domineering mother and weak/soft father, etc. These feelings manifest in so many ways, with symptoms including self-hate, very low self-esteem, lack of assertiveness, etc. Specially sensitive children are hit the hardest.
Modeling Failure. Because of perceived rejection, there is a failure to model ourselves after our father/father figure and fellow males. Since as children we are basically sexless at first, we end up modeling ourselves after the opposite figurehead instead: the female figure closest to us, our respective mothers.
Reparative Drive. But since we are still biologically and physiologically male, we will, as we grow up into young men, find a way to make up for our unmet need: the need for fatherly affection and male acceptance. This is where SSA comes in, which is actually an expression of envy for those we perceive to have what we haven’t got. There is now a strong ‘drive to repair’ what was damaged at the formative, even subconscious level.
Sexualization. Too bad the legitimate desire to to fulfill the need for male acceptance or male affirmation gets sexualized, driving us to find ways we can be satisfied. Unfortunately, because of human nature (basic instinct), we associate “satisfaction” with “sexual satisfaction,” which happens to be, in our case, “same-sex satifaction.” And being male, who is by nature sexual (compared to the female who’s more emotional), we persons with SSA end up to be hypersexual individuals, on top of having the constellation (as psychologists would say) of symptoms listed earlier.
To put it differently, the reparative drive gets sexualized because sex is the basic form of satisfaction. Sex becomes a medication to cure the deficit in masculinity.
**
Update: Here's an easy-to-read summarization of the psychology behind homosexuality or same-sex attraction: "The longing little boy." All of you, pro-gay lifestyle people should read this with intent. It's a Jewish man's version. (Remember that the Jews pioneered the field of psychology.)
Recommended readings:
Joseph Nicolosi on reparative therapy
Richard Cohen on manhood
Andrew (Andy) Comiskey on Christianity and healing the homosexual wound
Posted by R.O. at 12:28 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Guide to urban living
How to convey the message that you are very poor when doing the mall or walking the streets:
Flash your late-model cell phone and sprinkle it with a generous amount of dust and lint. This should be an effective strategy in fending off potential cell phone snatchers. No one will bother you, not even the "takatak boys" (street kids who sell cigarettes and stuff by making a noisy racket). Even your former classmates and officemates will swear to God they don't know that loser: you. In which case, you ought to be happy. You can be yourself the most when all you got to your name in a fashion-conscious society that dictates the latest wants as important needs or "must-haves" is a late-model fone. In this kind of society, your cell phone model defines who you are as a person. It is where your self-esteem is supposed to lie. Therefore, when your cell phone is snatched from you, there goes your self and your life too.
**
Schublig Sunday
Last Sunday was supposed to be Divine Mercy Sunday, where one hopes to gain "plenary indulgence." Problem is the confessionals were all closed, and you're supposed to confess and receive communion as prerequisites.
Because I was so disappointed, G. didn't have a hard time when he thought we should have lunch somewhere. I was inconsolable, but I thought the schublig I had at Kenny Rogers was a very nice consolation prize for my effort. That's the technical term for "Hungarian sausage." It was done just right: just like chicken longanisa with that interesting rubberized casing, but with darker, juicier and tenderer meat. (I repeated the dish in another branch yesterday, but the sausage was overdone. Ugh.)
Posted by R.O. at 11:47 AM 0 comments Links to this post

